The Oglesby case involved FOIA requests made to several different federal agencies. It also made some dicta statements regarding the mechanics of FOIA disclosure which should not be followed as a matter of sound administrative practice. Second, it placed a new procedural obligation on agencies that now must be met whenever they fail to locate records responsive to FOIA requests. First, it set forth a new interpretation of the rule of "administrative exhaustion" under the Act, which affects the handling of FOIA matters at the administrative level as well as in litigation. Circuit last December addressed three procedural aspects of FOIA administration, requiring agencies to adjust their administrative practices in two of these three respects. Department of the Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in Oglesby v. In some instances, such decisions require adjustments in the administration of the Act. Just as the contours of FOIA exemptions continue to evolve through the process of judicial interpretation, the Act's procedural provisions as well can be shaped and defined by major court decisions. In their implementation of the Freedom of Information Act, federal agencies must pay careful attention to all procedural, as well as substantive, provisions of the Act. OIP Guidance Procedural Rules Under the D.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |